Infant Visual Stimulation Revisited

Trixie stopped freaking out at the patterned images a long time ago. She’s still very interested in most of the them, but now in a controlled, deliberate manner. So what’s the verdict? What does she like best? While this survey of her preferences was not conducted in a rigorous manner, there were a few images that seemed to interest her above others. The common thread is surprising simple: a strong figure/ground relationship makes the cut. Images containing high black-to-white ratios fared well also. Mouse over this link to see which pictures she prefers. Among the winners, she likes the face best of all. A second set of images is now being created to test these results.

For more information: Actual research regarding Perceptual Development was conducted by Fantz (1961). His work indicates that babies really do have a Visual Preference for Faces. Thanks to Schaffer for this link.

This entry was posted in Metrics. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Infant Visual Stimulation Revisited

  1. schaff says:

    As Bower et al (1970) have shown (see link), it’s likely that it wasn’t so much the images that disturbed Trixie back on 8/19, but the fact you got all up in her grill. If I was a couple weeks old, I wouldn’t want somebody shoving paper in my face, and even now I don’t seek out this pastime.

    On another hand, the “visual cliff” of Gibson and Walk (1960) also demonstrated infant depth perception. But I feel that in 2003, with Xtreme Infancy currently in vogue, Trixie is ready to be tested on a “real cliff.” Dad, Mom? What do you think?

    Anyway, just proud to have become one of the few non-Trixie humans to be mentioned in the Trixie Update.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>